Spacefast vs here.now
Choose here.now for a direct agent-to-static-files workflow. Choose Spacefast when the same project needs private sharing, team access and retained versions.
Which publishing workflow fits?
| What matters | here.now | Spacefast |
|---|---|---|
| Starting point | Publish a file or folder through its agent skill. | Publish through an agent, the dashboard, CLI or API. |
| Files | Its overview lists HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, PDFs and video. | Host static output, or use a supported framework/runtime for an app. |
| First publish | Its overview says no account is required. | An anonymous publish returns an Open link, a private claim link and an expiry. |
| Choosing an audience | The overview promises a live URL; check its current docs for access-control requirements. | Spaces start private. Create a share link or make the Space public before sending it. |
Choose here.now when…
You have static files, want to stay in your agent, and here.now’s publishing flow fits. Its public overview is short and direct; it does not establish every limit or access feature, so this comparison does not score those.
Choose Spacefast when…
You want a publishing workflow with explicit access settings, a claim step, custom domains and versions you can restore. Spacefast also has supported paths for apps that need server code; exporting an app from another environment can still require changes.
Compare Spacefast’s current pricing and allowances. Check the other host’s current terms before choosing a plan.
Check the source. Try a real example.
Maintained by Spacefast. Sources checked October 31, 2026: here.now’s publishing overview. Features and eligibility can change; follow the source for the current requirements.
