Spacefast vs GitHub Pages

Choose GitHub Pages for a static site published from a GitHub repository. Choose Spacefast when publishing should work directly from an agent or folder, with an explicit sharing step.

Which publishing workflow fits?

What mattersGitHub PagesSpacefast
Starting pointHTML, CSS and JavaScript from a repository on GitHub, optionally through a build process.Files from an agent, drop.fast, the CLI or API; a Git repository is optional.
Site typeGitHub describes Pages as static site hosting.Static sites, plus supported application paths for server code and a built-in database.
DomainsGitHub documents default Pages addresses and custom domains.Use a Space address or connect a custom domain with managed HTTPS.
SharingCheck GitHub’s plan and repository visibility requirements for the site you intend to publish.New Spaces are private. A recipient needs an invitation, a share link or public access.

Choose GitHub Pages when…

Your content already lives in GitHub, is static, and a repository-based publishing workflow is what you want. It is a natural option for project documentation and personal sites.

Choose Spacefast when…

You want to publish from a local folder or chat without first creating a repository, or want a Space’s access settings, versions and supported runtime features. A static Pages site can usually move as built files; a server app needs a compatible runtime.

Compare Spacefast’s current pricing and allowances. Check the other host’s current terms before choosing a plan.

Check the source. Try a real example.

Maintained by Spacefast. Sources checked October 31, 2026: GitHub’s Pages overview. Features and eligibility can change; follow the source for the current requirements.

Publish something you made.

Set it up yourself

Works with any AI